Showing posts with label AFL-CIO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AFL-CIO. Show all posts

Pennies, Nickles, Dollars Slip Away  

Like many folks, I've been reading loads of reports on Union organizing. Like the recently released report No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing by Columbia professor Dr. Kate Bronfenbrenner and Majority Authorizations and Union Organizing in the Public Sector: A Four-State Perspective From the AFL-CIO Now Blog:

If you sign up to join a union, you won’t face coercion or intimidation from your co-workers—or employers. Despite dire warnings by corporations against the majority sign-up process, a new study shows majority sign-up (card-check) protects workers and gives them the chance they need to form a union. It’s another critical point in favor of the Employee Free Choice Act, which would give workers across the country the choice about how to form a union and bargain for a better life.


Here's the problem, being in a union makes our lives better. I can testify to this (thank you AFGE and my shop steward). However, the point at which you and your co-workers decide that you need a union, the worst is yet to come.

You see, the moment we decide that together we bargain and divided we beg, is the same point at which employers pull out the big guns. This is where firing happens. This is also where mandatory meetings happen where employers tell workers they'll lose benefits they have or the shop will close or it will mean a loss of your work shift or whatever else they think might be a topic of interest to you.

When we decide to stop begging for the right to work, our employers don't stop looking for ways to divide us, instead, they learn that they have all the power in this country in terms of labor law and they do not care how often, how hard or to what extent they trample our rights. And if you lose the organizing drive, few will ever even attempt to hold the employer accountable for trampling the few rights we do have.

And yes, I'm serious!

From the Bronfrenbrenner report:

Furthermore, workers are keenly aware that even in cases with egregious employer violations, the most likely penalty is a posting and a small amount of back pay, which could take more than two years from filing the charge to a final Board decision to collect...


Of course, this is why there's such a dramatic need for the Employee Choice Act.

But the other wrinkle to this, and one of the main reasons for Uniongal at all, is that like many women in the workforce, I am a single mom. I am the sole bread winner for my family. I am cook, cleaner, glass washer, launder, nurse, baker, bread winner, transporter, psychologist and maintainer.

I do it all.

And when you do it all, you're way more susceptible to intimidation, and even worse, you're constantly trying to figure it all out as a mom while also making ends meet, kind of like the 10,000 Maniac's song, Dust Bowl Days where Natalie Merchant sings about how this mom just can't get ahead:



All workers know the feeling. When our employer goes that extra mile to ensure that you, their employee, knows your place and that unionization (of any kind or even thought) is a no-no. Brings me back to Dr. Kate Bronfenbrenner's report and her description not of a single event in the unsuccessful United Steelworkers organizing campaign at Rugby, but Rugby's overall strategy:

The most important part of the Rugby story is not the most dramatic—the discharges and layoffs—but rather the full arc of the employer’s plan, which in fact started not with the meeting with the supervisors, but as Bogas points out in his decision, with its aggressive union-free policy. This policy was clearly outlined in the employee handbook, and read out loud to all new employees upon hiring. It made it clear that unions would not be tolerated, laying the groundwork for the aggressive and intense effort that followed. But the model that Rugby and so many others of these campaigns adopt is one in which the priority task of frontline supervisors is to ascertain through whatever means possible the leanings of every worker and then use the more aggressive retaliatory tactics to sway those leaning toward unionization.


On any given day, workers across this country are exposed to supervisors and companies who see them as worthless, incompetent or union sympathizing "thugs". These are good workers. They are you and me. They are your moms and dads. Even your brothers and sisters. In fact, you might actually be one of these workers. You aren't incompetent. You aren't a thug or a trouble maker. You have the right to join, form or to organize a union. But we have to demand that right to make that decision without having to go through the crap that employers throw at us.

So, to summarize, if you, as an employee feel you need a union, and you work toward that end, your employer can behave egregiously (fire you or your co-workers, suspend you, strip you of all sorts of things at work, etc...) and there's little or no consequence and when there actually is a violation found, it takes years to collect; ages to get justice. But if you win and you are in the union, you risk far less in terms of retaliation or intimidation from not only your employer but also co-workers. And, there's this new Bill in the Senate called the Employee Free Choice Act which aims at leveling the playing field, making it easier for employees to decide if they want to go through an election or to sign up using a simple card.

So, there you have it. Two recent reports that I've been reading. My thoughts about how it all relates and my hope in the end that single moms like me and many others can simply be able to do better than to just get by. It kind of sucks out here sometimes. It sure would be nice to have a Congress that understood what it's like to watch pennies, nickles and dollars slip away and how being in a union can help to stop that from being the case.

Thank you Dr. Bronfenbrenner for researching these issues and more importantly, giving a voice to so many workers just through the numbers you cite. Who knew a bunch of numbers and stories could be so powerful. If you get a minute, head over to the report, it's really very shocking.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Netroots Nation DC Event On Employee Free Choice!  

I just looked and there appear to still be seats available for this Downtown (near the White House) event:

Greedy CEOs and anti-union front groups are already working overtime to defeat the Employee Free Choice Act. To make sure they don't win, we need to ramp up our activism.

But what role is there for online activism in the fight? How can unions and progressive allies beat back fear-mongering from the corporate interests? What messaging tools will be employed by pro-employee choice groups, and how can the Netroots stand up to the anti-union echo-chamber?

This Friday, join Stewart Acuff of the AFL-CIO, Laura Clawson of Daily Kos, Rebecca Wasserman of American Rights at Work and Michael Whitney of the SEIU for a conversation on how the Netroots can make employee free choice a reality in 2009. The panel will be moderated by Christopher Hayes, Washington DC editor of The Nation.

Click here to reserve your spot.

Netroots Nation DC
Friday, May 8, noon to 2 p.m.
AFL-CIO, George Meany Room
815 16th St. NW, Washington DC


This event is part of the Netroots Nation Salon Series, launched in August 2008 to provide year-round opportunities for the progressive community to exchange ideas and learn how to be more effective in using technology to influence the public debate.

Passing the Employee Free Choice Act will level the playing field and put the power back where it belongs—in the hands of workers. Click here to join us for this important discussion.

Thanks for making a difference.
Karen, Mary, Nolan and Raven

PS: Space is extremely limited, so be sure to RSVP now.


I'm working, so I can't attend. But anyone who does, drop me a line, I'd love to post some info on the event.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

My Co-Worker Talks About Ed Schultz Show  

Well, so to speak. I doubt she actually watched the show, but for some reason she's talking to me about immigration and working.



Okay, so you've now seen the video from The Ed Show from yesterday. So, let's talk about Karen, my coworker.

She comes by my desk and says, "Did you hear about the idea of making sure everyone has an ID? I mean, even illegals?"

So, I'll bite, "WTF are you talking about?"

Karen: Think about it. If they have IDs, then they can also pay taxes.
Me: oh, okay. Can we make drugs legal too? I'd like to tax the hell out of the suppliers and products.
Karen: No, come on, I'm serious. If I have to pay 25% of my income in taxes, then they should, too. It's only fair.
Me: And balanced?
Karen: Ah, a Faux News jab, nice.
Me: Karen, it's interesting. I like the idea of ensuring that people who have come here legally have a path to citizenship.
Karen: Brilliant, isn't it?

So, Karen seems to be on to something that was discussed last night on the Ed Show, and I know she doesn't watch it, she doesn't get home in time. But I have to think the AFL-CIO and CtW are on to something here. Here's what Trumka said that kind of goes to what Karen was talking about:

Where do the unions, and in this deal, deal with those students that are here that are forced to go home?

TRUMKA: Well, first of all, that‘s called the status adjustment.

Look at them and see if they are actually needed and let them stay here.

They‘ve contributed. Many have stayed here for several years.

About 40 to 45 percent of the illegal immigrants in this country don‘t cross the border. They come in legally with visas and then just don‘t leave. So we need to have that adjusted as well so that workers—so a permanent underclass isn‘t created, those workers exploited, those exploited workers drive down wages for all workers.


She was arguing, in her very Karenesq way that immigrant workers shouldn't be exploited and be forced to live under the radar, because, when they do, they also don't pay taxes. Income or payroll taxes. She sees these things taken out of her pay check, she pays her taxes on or before April 15th every year and she only really wants the same for workers here.

I told her that CtW and the AFl-CIO were talking about this sort of thing too, but in a way that first protects US workers first, you know citizens. When we talk US workers, I mean every naturalized citizen and every native born one as well. I'm only 2nd Generation American. If my family hadn't gotten a legal shot at citizenship here, I'd probably be in Finland right now. But we did, and we all pay taxes (that I know of). Kind of like a blending of Karen's idea and that of the AFL-CIO and CtW. Who knew great minds could think so alike? I bet Karen did.

For more Ed Show stuff, you should check out his show!!
Veteran talk radio host Ed Schultz joins MSNBC's primetime lineup hosing 'The Ed Show' from 6 p.m. EST to 7 p.m. EST. The show will debate and discuss issues affecting all Americans.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

New Resource for the Unemployed  

A searchable database that uses zip codes. Kind of cool and I thought, let's share the news:

Working America and the AFL-CIO have put together a new site: http://www.unemploymentlifeline.com/

It's a massive database (closing in on 60,000 items and still growing) of resources for unemployed workers. Since unemployed/underemployed is now the biggest "job" category in the country, and unemployment rates just keep going up, this is a crisis for all working people and the Unemployment Lifeline is about dealing with that. In addition to the zip code searchable database of unemployment offices, nutritional and utility assistance information, affordable health clinics, child care, and so on, it includes forums for people to make connections with others who are unemployed, a wiki for strategies to get by, and, equally importantly, action alerts to give jobless workers the chance to fight back.


There's a diary up on Dailykos about it as well.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AFL-CIO Hiring Now  

Here's the info:

AFL-CIO Field Communicator
Thursday, January 22, 2009

IMMEDIATE OPENING: AFL-CIO FIELD COMMUNICATORS

Duration: Six-month to a year
Salary: Approx. $625 per week plus benefits
Location: Various targeted states
Start Date: Immediate

The AFL-CIO field communicators will help drive public opinion and marshall community and union member support for the Employee Free Choice Act in key states.

The field communicators are full-time staff who work in the field in key states, through the local bodies of the AFL-CIO, to do communications at an external and internal level as part of the larger legislative and member mobilization campaign of the Employee Free Choice Act.

Duties include:

External
Track public communications around the Employee Free Choice Act in state and implement rapid response, when necessary;

Proactively work to place positive pieces on Employee Free Choice Act from labor leaders and allies;

Identify current and potential allies in the community (i.e. academic, religious, civil rights, labor side attorneys, etc.) and work to develop as spokespeople;

Identify reporters in state likely to write on Employee Free Choice Act and establish relationship, set up meetings with leaders, etc.;

Do media outreach surrounding events to support Employee Free Choice Act;

Identify workers with stories that highlight why the legislation is necessary and develop them as spokespeople.

Internal
Work with state federation, central labor councils and AFL-CIO regional staff on public messaging, and on statewide communications strategy. May include some training;

Work with local union publications to help with member education and encourage locals to use Working Families Toolkit newsletter and website tools - in some cases, develop blogs. Work with state feds and clcs to develop internal capacity to use tools;

Write weekly leadership update/newsletter through GetActive Center centered around driving a conversation to the labor movement about the Employee Free Choice Act. Profile local unions, leaders, activists, retirees - -making the content using photos, videos, etc.

Create and edit video and photos supporting the Employee Free Choice Act fight reinforcing the core message;

Using all communication vehicles to build an echo chamber for reinforcing field program activity (worksite leafeting, phones, walks, etc around Employee Free Choice Act).

The field communicator should be an effective writer and communicator with a deep interest in addressing issues affecting working people.

Previous experience with unions, student labor coalitions, community organizations allied with labor or other labor-related organizations is a plus, but not a requirement.

People of color, bilingual applicants, and women are encouraged to apply.

Please send a cover letter describing your interest and qualifications for the position, a resume, and a writing sample (1000 words max) to Bernard Pollack at bpollack@aflcio.org or to Bernard Pollack at the AFL-CIO Political Department, 815 Sixteenth Street, NW , Washington, D.C. 20006.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

So, What 'Ya Doin' This Weekend?  

I'm planning to take my daughter to an event (sometimes, being a parent with the massive schedules can really be a bummer), however, if you're in Ashtabula this weekend, why not head over to the LiUNA hall on Rt. 20 and canvass Labor to Neighbor. Here's the info from the Ashtabula County AFL-CIO president Ray Gruber:

All: the Ashtabula County AFL-CIO will be walking Labor to Neighbor on Saturday, October 25th. We will be meeting at the Laborers Hall, Local 245 in North Kingsville. The hours will be between 11:00a.m. till 1:30p.m. Local 245 is located on Rt. 20 East, just 2 ½ miles east of the Ashtabula Mall. Starting October 31st thru November 4th (what a day that will be) we will be conducting the Get Out The Vote process.


I'll be doing Labor Get-Out-The-Vote the weekend of the 31st. If you're in town, feel free to drop me a line!!

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Joe-the-Businessman  

Is really Sam the owner of a small business. A Registered Republican, Ohio tax evadered, not a licensed plumber (check for yourself), and oh yeah, NOT a UNION Plumber!

So, why is being a union plumber in Ohio important, because it's a closed shop state. That means that if you're going to be a plumber (most likely a steamfitter or pipefitter), you'll likely be working major construction projects (unless you're working for Roto-Rooter and many of them are also unionized workers) and yuo aren't doing that if you aren't a union member. You certainly aren't doing any local, state or fed projects.

SO, how do I know he's not a union member? I asked.

And who did I ask?

Tim Burga, Chief of Staff of the Ohio AFL-CIO and here's what Tim had to say:

"Joe is not a plumber he's a businessman. If we don't elect Barack Obama, the plumbing business and working families dreams will go down the drain."


'nuff said.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

No ONE Is Able To Keep Us Down  



Yeah, what he said.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Labor History: Maud Younger the Millionaire Waitress  

The past few weeks have been filled with busy, busy days. I have been to my 20th class reunion and I continue to do events around DC for the Obama4UnityBeatsMcCain slate that I am running on for the DC Democratic State Committee. Hell, I’ve even had a friend visit and I had the sheer pleasure of hanging out with UnionReview’s own Richard Negri one night last weekend. In all of this, I’ve been thinking about women, unions and what exactly all of our stories really are and where they are.

This is probably due to the current negotiations with the WTU that I’ve been reporting on for longer than I’d like (seriously, sure looks like Fenty and Rhee are anti-worker in all this). It may have something to do with the recent election of Randi Weingarten, Antonia Cortese and Loretta Johnson at the American Federation of Teachers.

So, as the 88th Anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment fast approaches, I’ve become even more interested in this discussion, so much so, that I decided that perhaps another Labor History lesson should be posted to remind all of us that the labor movement has always been entwined with other movements, including that of Women’s Suffrage. This brings us to Samuel Gompers and Maud Younger.

Way back in the early years of the 20th century, Samuel Gompers worked to develop a strategy for the adoption of a prevailing wage to be used for workers across the country. A prevailing wage is one where the wage of work accomplished is based on the prevailing wage in that area. So, a contractor in Alabama cannot compete on a contract in Michigan and import workers from Alabama and pay an Alabama wage in Michigan. Need more on the prevailing wage and history of it, I’d suggest this source.

In working for a prevailing wage, he was forced to also discourage those pushing for a minimum wage, enter Maud Younger.

Maud Younger had been born to wealth but didn’t allow her status to be her only defining attribute. As a unionist, Maud was able to bridge different movements by combining her grassroots activism with her socialite status. She used this leverage to work on issues related to an 8 hour work day, 6 day work week, minimum wage and child labor, getting most of these initiatives into law in California within her lifetime. However, the one issue that seems to have been a sticking point between her movement to win for women child labor laws and a living wage was the concept of a prevailing wage which Samuel Gompers wrote, imploring her to desist from minimum wage activities:

I trust that you will proceed with the utmost caution in any effort to establish a minimum wage by statutory law. Speaking fundamentally a minimum wage should be established and maintained by the organizations of labor. If a minimum wage law for working men is established by law, by the same token it is more than probable that it may finally transpire that another law will be enacted, compelling working men to work for such a minimum as a maximum.


Gompers went on to state in his letter to Maud that:

I think it advisable to call to your attention, and trust that you will profit by it, this observation: many person appear to be impressed with the notion that legal enactments will solve the labor problem, and much theorizing is indulged in relative to the extent to which legislation can favorably affect working people, but they fail to counterbalance their reasoning by recognizing a possibility that if laws can be placed upon the statute books establishing minimum wages, and kindred measures, by the same process of reasoning, there may be other laws placed upon the stature books that will be extremely detrimental to working people.


As Gompers worked toward prevailing wage rates on the state level, Maud was hard at work pushing for women and men to obtain a minimum wage to ensure that they were able to feed their families earn a living and find a way out of poverty which would allow their children to go to school instead of working. But for Maud, workers’ rights and women’s suffrage were intertwined. This interconnection propelled Maud to organize from the roots up:

Younger returned to California, where she organized San Francisco’s first waitress union (1908) and was instrumental in the passage of the state’s eight-hour-day work law.

Since Younger viewed working and voting rights as closely related issues, she helped found the Wage Earners’ Equal Suffrage League for Working Women, spoke on the vote in union halls around the state, and encouraged men to support the women’s cause. A master of showmanship, she created publicity for state suffrage with a Wage Earner’s Equal Suffrage League float in the 1911 Labor Day parade in San Francisco. In that year she helped lobby for passage of a woman suffrage amendment to the California constitution.


Maud worked tirelessly for women’s rights, from working with the International Ladies Garment Workers Union (ILGWU now UNITE-HERE) against subcontracting in New York to lobbying Congress for women’s suffrage, missing no opportunity to highlight the cause, including an article in McCall's Magazine where she described some of the difficulties she faced as an activist and a woman:

Though great strides were being made, gains never came easy, as the suffrage movement met with considerable obstacles throughout the country. For instance, in Dallas, Texas, just as the United States was ready to enter World War I, National Women's Party organizers were prevented from hiring halls and hotel rooms for Younger and her colleagues. The mayor of the city refused to allow Younger to hold a street meeting. City officials even refused when Younger offered to submit her speech for review and possible censorship. The party met with similar obstacles in Tennessee. Reportedly, members of the War Association and Home Defense League went to every hotel and meeting place in the state and requested that Younger be refused rooms and halls. They also went to city mayors and asked that they refuse to grant permits for street meetings. In 1919, Younger wrote about her experiences in an article for McCall's magazine entitled "Revelations of a Woman Lobbyist."


Maud Younger passed away June 25, 1936, at her ranch in Los Gatos, California. Despite her age and health, Maud remained focused on women’s rights, serving as the National Women’s Party Congressional chair until her passing. As an ardent supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, she championed the cause of women and women in the workplace through her tireless advocacy.

As I look toward celebrating the 88th anniversary of Women’s Right To Vote, I, and women all over this country owe a debt of gratitude to the millionaire Waitress, Maud Younger.

Perhaps someday, we can even have an exhibit on Maud in the National Women’s History Museum

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Veterans and Unions  

Just got an e-mail from a friend at the AFL-CIO and I wanted to share:

Hi, All:

We launched the AFL-CIO Union Veterans Council today, made up of members from multiple unions who are taking part in roundtables with union vets around the nation today. They will continue to get out the message throughout the election season that there's a big difference between McCain's war record and the anti-working family policies he'd pursue as president.

Jim Wasser, an IBEW member and union vet, is featured in a TV ad we're running in select communities.

More than 2.1 million union members are military veterans--and we all need to reach out to them and get out the word on the Real McCain.

We have a post at Firedoglake.


and lots of info, including the TV ad and fliers on where Obama and McCain stand on vets issues, here:

http://www.unionveterans.org

Hope you can spread the word to your union members who are military veterans.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AFL-CIO Organizer Training  

From the DC Metro Labor Council:


ORGANIZING INSTITUTE DEADLINE NEXT WEEK: Time is running out to register for the AFL-CIO Organizing Institute's June 6-8 organizer training in Baltimore. "Registrations should be into us by May 30," TJ Marsallo tells UNION CITY. The training will give activist union members basic organizing skills, including one-on-one communication skills, how to move workers to take action, leadership identification and the basic elements of a union organizing campaign. AFL-CIO affiliated and non-affiliated unions are welcome to attend. For details, contact Marsallo at 202-639-6290 or amarsall@aflcio.org.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Thanks Diane Hansen For Reminding Me What I Need To Do This Year!  

There’s an election going on right now. I doubt any of us can escape it right now. But it’s gotten me thinking about what we do from here on out in terms of reaching out to brothers and sisters in the movement to not only tell them about their benefits (um, you have many that you aren’t using from travel to dental, they’re your benefits, use them) to how to make sure that we have both a Democrat in the White House and a solid majority in the Senate and House.

So, as I’m thinking about this, I ran across an AFL-CIO story on Diane Hansen:

“When we started the political action committee a few years ago, I'd like to say that I felt about it the way I do now—that I'm doing it because I want to give something back to the union and community—but I didn't come to that realization until I'd be involved and saw how important it was,” she says.

Hansen, 42, became involved in political action in a 2002 county supervisor campaign and by the time 2004 elections rolled around, she had learned some of the nuts and bolts of political mobilizing.

“We had three main goals: implementing a voter registration program, enacting and following the AFL-CIO's 10 Point Political Action Plan and plugging into AFL-CIO GOTV [Get Out The Vote] program,” she says

Hansen, who continued her full-time job throughout the campaign, spent an additional 30 hours a week leafleting worksites, recruiting members for phone banks and taking part in door-to-door walks to talk with union members about issues critical to working families.

>snip<

Hanson says her experience demonstrated how one-on-one communication with members is “one of the most effective means of communication” and “should be the cornerstone in all campaigns.” She credits the work of all the unions working together with the unprecedented member mobilization in the 2004 elections.

“Union teamwork produced solidarity. I don't think we'd ever seen such a strong coming together of unions for a common cause,” she says.


And what this little story about activism inspired in me was the concept that we need to not only work on membership but we also have to bring everyone else along in our fight for worker’s rights. And this of course, reminded me of the McCain Revealed campaign which succinctly breaks down why American Workers and Unions can’t afford 4 more years of this hell.





McCain Revealed


Sometimes, we just need to remind ourselves that 4 more years of this just isn’t acceptable. I know it hasn’t worked for me, and I’d be willing to guess it hasn’t for most of you.

So, I’m willing to do this year what Diane Hansen has done, I’m getting more active. Way, way more active. I don’t want to look back a year from now and regret not wearing out a pair of shoes canvassing. I want to know that we’ve put the right person into the White House, and in no way, shape, or form is that person John McCain.

Thank you Diane.

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AFL-CIO Announces Video Contest!  

I found this on the AFL-CIO Now Blog

How Would You Turn Around America? Send Us a Video and You Could Win

by Mike Hall, Apr 10, 2008


Most people agree our nation is heading in the wrong direction—from health care to the economy to global warming to the war in Iraq. We want to know how you think we can “Turn Around America” and put us back on the right track.

Today, the AFL-CIO launches a “Turn Around America” Online Video Competition for you to answer the following questions: “How can we turn around what most of us agree is our country’s wrong-headed direction? What’s not working? What changes would you like to see? How do we get it done?” You can use any form of visual expression, including songs, poetry, comedy and/or animation, as long as your entry is in the form of a video, to send us your thoughts and ideas.

Some contest-winning videos will be featured in TV ads to get the “Turn Around America” message out to voters and candidates this election year, and some winners also will walk away with some cash.

The national grand prize winner will receive $2,000 and there is a $2,000 “Young Activist” award for a video submitted by someone between the ages of 14 and 25 as of April 1, 2008. Also, winners in up to a dozen cities where AFL-CIO “Turn Around America” rallies, marches and other events are scheduled through the summer, will win $1,000 each. There also is an “Our America” award for the video with the most online votes. (Click here for more information about the judging and the prizes.)

The video contest is part of the union movement’s “Turn Around America” mobilization in which we’re reaching out to working family voters around the country, building grassroots momentum to elect leaders who will fight for health care, workers’ freedom to form unions, fair trade and an economy that works for all.

AFL-CIO Executive Vice President Arlene Holt Baker says the campaign was inspired by retired United Steelworkers (USW) member Steve Skvara. Last summer, Skvara told 20,000 union members and eight candidates at the AFL-CIO Presidential Candidates Forum the emotional and moving story of the difficulty in finding and affording health care for his wife. Then he asked:

What’s wrong with America and what will you do to change it?

Says Holt Baker:

Every day we hear from working people like Steve who believe that in order to make America work, we need to do a complete 180 degree turn. This video contest is meant to inspire people to envision how we can create a better nation.


The contest runs through May 20 and winners will be announced in early June.

The judges come from the worlds of labor, film, stage, documentaries, comedy and television. Some of the notables are longtime progressive documentary filmmaker, Barbara Kopple; Robert Greenwald, director and producer of “Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism” and “Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price”; comedian Damon Williams; and Gillian Grisman, director and producer of “Grateful Dawg” and “Keeping Time: New Music from America’s Roots.” (Click here for more information about the judges.)

Says Grisman:

Like so many Americans, I have been asking myself the same questions that are posted in this contest. I’m looking forward to seeing the creative responses to the challenge because I believe art speaks truth to power and will spark a meaningful dialogue about how we can turn this country around.


Local winners will be chosen from Philadelphia; Pittsburgh; Cleveland; Cincinnati; Columbus, Ohio; Denver; Detroit; Portland, Ore.; New Hampshire; Maine; St. Louis; Chicago; and the St. Paul/Minneapolis/Rochester, Minn., area.

There are a number of guidelines you will need to follow. For example, the videos must be no longer than three-and-a-half minutes in length; you must be 14 years old or older as of April 1, 2008; do not include any reference to any political person, candidate, party, association or corporation in any way. Click here for the entire set of guidelines and here for contest rules.

Roll ‘em!


Now, I just have to get my 14 year old to take our video camera and run with this!!

Digg!

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AFL-CIO Endorses Scott Kleeb for NE Senate  

Need more info about Scott, then watch the video



You can also go to his site here.

For more on Nebraska's AFL-CIO primary endorsement, check out Dailykos.


Digg!

Read More...
AddThis Social Bookmark Button